What should a good editorial do to a reader, and what not. Thanks to the responsiveness of our reviewers and managing editors, the mean turn around time for an editorial decision and feedback to the author for initial manuscript submissions to JPP over the past year has been 32 days.
We hope that the feeling is mutual. Give a strong position of the opposition. That is a subtle distinction to maintain.
For instance, if the Presidential elections are around the corner, focus on a particular political topic. Moreover, a good editorial is contemporary without being populist. Identify the people specifically who oppose you.
Or thank a policymaker for being a champion for infants and toddlers in the state or community.
It must, moreover, want you to give it a second read. And the readers, including fellow editors, will hugely enjoy the fare offered, as they savour the stuff that goes into edit writing. The last, and probably most important, a good editorial should be brief. If this country is to remain globally competitive, we argue, there is no greater return than an investment in our youngest assets — our children.
Narrow down your area of interest with as much precision as is possible. However, let it not mean that balance in temperament excludes crusading zeal.
Rejecting them outright without any explanation screams of cowardice and unprofessional ethics.
Make no mistake about it. Small-circulation newspapers usually print many of the letters they receive. Introduction, body and conclusion like other news stories 2.
However, it goes beyond an analysis. Give opposing viewpoint first with its quotations and facts 6. On average, managing editors of JPP invite at least four reviewers in order to obtain three reviews. A timely news angle 4. We hope some smart publisher is reading this.
Choose your topic wisely For maximum impact, choose an issue that has been making the headlines recently. In essence, an editorial is an opinionated news story. We wonder if ever an exercise to publish all editorials of a certain publication has been undertaken, say over a five or ten year period.
During these early years, neurons are being connected at a rate that far surpasses any other age period. That itself is not uninteresting. Moreover, if you have suggestions to improve the review process and our collaboration with you, please do not suffer in silence.
Conflicts of interest between reviewers and authors can also raise important ethical issues: Concede a valid point of the opposition which will make you appear rational, one who has considered all the options fiscal times are tough, and we can cut some of the funding for the arts; however, ….
Moreover, students, fellows, or junior faculty who are interested in receiving mentoring in the process of reviews should consider joining JPP's mentoring program, which now includes more than mentors and mentees.
A rigorous national evaluation of Early Head Start found significant impacts in language skills, social skills and interactions, and behavior.
Of course what it analyses can be the basis of the production of new evidence. Give opposing viewpoint first with its quotations and facts 6. Opinions from the opposing viewpoint that refute directly the same issues the writer addresses 5.
Virtually every scientific journal publishes editorials or other opinion articles that accompany research articles or other reports or that present views and perspectives of the editors of the journal related to a published article, current issue, or journal policy.
To sum up, a good editorial is either one or more of the following: it is an opinion maker, it is reconciliatory between contrary viewpoints or standpoints, it is balanced in its analysis of evidence and events, and it is, manifest or otherwise, crusading in its thrust. Reviewers should keep in mind that minor matters of editorial style will be managed by the copy editor and need not be a focus of the review.
Represent the Content of Reviews Succinctly and Clearly. Authors face a formidable challenge in responding to each of the editorial points that are made by the reviewers and the managing editor.
In response, an editorial board member might write a piece detailing the qualifications of manuscripts that are a good fit for the journal, and how to write a manuscript to effectively communicate.
Journal of Medical Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, Editorial Open Access Tips on How to Write Editorial Articles Dr N.
Mallikarjuna Rao Editor in Chief An editorial article can be about anything and from any standpoint. Articles come in all shapes and sizes.
They are in Medical Journals. Nov 12, · Edit Article How to Write a Notable Editorial. Three Methods: The Basics Writing Your Editorial Sample Editorial Community Q&A An editorial is an article that presents a group's opinion on an issue and because of this, it is usually unsigned%().Writing an editorial for a journal